Today's most viewed
Council rejects gipsy site shortlist
SECURITY guards were on standby last night as North Wiltshire District Council met to discuss a controversial shortlist for a permanent gipsy and traveller site in the district.
But the six security guards, two Police Community Support Officers and extra council staff were not needed to control the crowds, who breathed a sigh of relief as the council's executive committee voted to reject all six shortlisted sites.
More than 100 people filled The Olympiad Leisure Centre to hear the news that potential sites in Chippenham, Calne and Wootton Bassett were being scrapped.
North Wiltshire District Council's lead member for housing, Howard Greenman, said: "It has been torturous for many people and there has been a dark cloud hanging over many communities.
"But tonight all of you should get closure. With this six-week consultation we have tried to be as clear and transparent with you as possible.
"Some information we believed to be set in stone on April 24 we have since dismissed. I would like the communities of each site all to be able to draw a line under what they have been through in the last six weeks."
But some members of the public were worried the Government would step in and demand a site in North Wiltshire.
Leader of North Wilts Dick Tonge said: "There is a feeling if the sites are not produced in the long term the Government could come in heavy handed with us and we have no choice. However, that is just my view."
But Cllr Greenman added: "They wouldn't have a leg to stand on."
Cllr Greenman refused to reveal any details of any private sites that were had been submitted during the consultation citing it would be unfair to the landowners who may not know their land was under the microscope.
Councillors said they planned to challenge central Government on the number of sites demanded in north Wiltshire, which currently stands at 48, the criteria they were based under and ask for gipsy sites to be considered in other parts of the county.
Sites included in the shortlist, all of which were in public ownership, included Long Close, Hardens Mead and Stanley Lane in Chippenham.
10:15am Friday 4th July 2008
Print 
Email this 
CommentPosted by: chris, melksham on 11:35am Fri 4 Jul 08
why cant the council just extend the site that they already have in chippenham surely that would make more scence. i dont think they ever intended to build on these six sites its just their way of scaremongering <i think thats the right word for it> and to keep the big cheeses off their backs for a while, when else has a council ever been concerned by what the voters want. never. i would also bet on the 250k dissapearing as well if it has'nt already
why cant the council just extend the site that they already have in chippenham surely that would make more scence. i dont think they ever intended to build on these six sites its just their way of scaremongering <i think thats the right word for it> and to keep the big cheeses off their backs for a while, when else has a council ever been concerned by what the voters want. never. i would also bet on the 250k dissapearing as well if it has'nt already
Posted by: Necker, Trowbridge on 12:07am Sat 5 Jul 08
250k down the swanny
How much was spent processing and dealing with this whole fiasco.
Our taxmoney spent on projects and excercises the taxpayers do not want.
Have you ever heard of anything so anti-community in your life?
Driven by community elected officials too.
Well done to all concerned this time round.
[quote]Cllr Greenman refused to reveal any details of any private sites[/quote]
Its not quite finished then, still some little secret things bubbling in the background.
250k down the swanny
How much was spent processing and dealing with this whole fiasco.
Our taxmoney spent on projects and excercises the taxpayers do not want.
Have you ever heard of anything so anti-community in your life?
Driven by community elected officials too.
Well done to all concerned this time round.
Cllr Greenman refused to reveal any details of any private sites
Its not quite finished then, still some little secret things bubbling in the background.
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!
