News RSS Feed


Support Your Local Christmas Time Swap Shop Service Excellence

Got a story? CLICK HERE to email us, call the newsdesk on 01225 773638 or text your tip-offs to 80360, starting your message with WILTS TIMES'

Earth shelter plan rejected

9:05am Thursday 28th August 2008

comment Comments (16)   Have your say »

By Victoria Ashford »

PLANS to build an underground home in a west Wiltshire village have been rejected by councillors.

The ecological three-bedroom earth shelter project in High Street, Chapmanslade, near Warminster, was refused planning permission by West Wiltshire District Council's planning committee on Thursday as it was deemed to be 'outside of village policy limits'.

Alvin Howard, agent for the project on behalf of the applicant Clive Michael, from Chapmanslade, said they would be appealing the decision.

He said: "It is outside the village development policy area so it is against policy legally but the point is that there is a new Government clause which states that if you design a beautiful house with the latest technology that is an inspiration to others, we should be given planning permission, but that wasn't the case.

"We will go to the Government (the Secretary of State for the Environment) because they included the clause and clearly the district council didn't look at it properly. They just look over it with their petty rules.

"I really thought they would be more enlightened."

The house would be built using low emission concrete and recycled stone and rubble, similar to that used in the Roman times.

This type of house is usually built with underground heat recovery and costs 30 per cent more than an above ground house of an equivalent size.

Properties like this are designed to last for more than 1,000 years.

Parish councillors felt the building would be contrary to the development plan for the village.

The Environment Agency also objected, saying it would 'create an unacceptable risk of pollution', The two main benefits of an earth shelter are that it takes on the ambient temperature of the soil around it, and isn't attacked by above ground emissions that deteriorate buildings.

Mr Howard, a member of the British Earth Sheltering Association, said: "One always thinks of dank, dark caves where hobbits live but it's not like that at all."


Your Say YourTimes

Paul, Warminster says...
9:31am Thu 28 Aug 08

The Environment Agency also objected, saying it would 'create an unacceptable risk of pollution',


How can a ecological built house create pollution if all the plans have been looked at and agreed.
Surly this is the way most houses should be built nowadays.

Disgusted of, Westbury says...
12:05pm Thu 28 Aug 08


Maybe the applicant forgot to hand over the brown envelope?


CONFUSED OF MELKSHAM, MELKSHAM says...
12:54pm Thu 28 Aug 08

Watch out stonehenge, the planners will be knocking it down when they realise it didn't have planning consent and is not constucted using local stone and is not in the local developement plan.

Local Bloke, Leigh Park, Westbury says...
12:55pm Thu 28 Aug 08

Government planning rules do allow special situations outside town or village limits (ie. in the middle of the protected countryside) such as new stately homes and homes demonstrating the very latest cutting-edge new technologies ....

BUT, this planning application is just a try-on by a farmer to get some residential development of an unusual kind on his field. The design does not involve anything new. There are plenty of examples of earth homes already, and one more will demonstrate nor prove nothing new.

It will be interesting to see if this applicant does try an Appeal and then whether the appeal is upheld or dismissed.

Local Bloke, Leigh Park, Westbury says...
1:18pm Thu 28 Aug 08

CONFUSED OF MELKSHAM wrote:
Watch out stonehenge, the planners will be knocking it down when they realise it didn't have planning consent and is not constucted using local stone and is not in the local developement plan.
The development control system refers to planning policies for NEW development proposals.

So, if any changes to Stonehenge were seriously proposed, these would be treated as new development proposals that would be subject to all the relevant conservation policies that protect an extremely important ancient monument (arguably one of the 7 wonders of the world).

Mr_flibble, trowbridge says...
1:20pm Thu 28 Aug 08

Disgusted of wrote:
Maybe the applicant forgot to hand over the brown envelope?
where is your evidence of this? You should blow this story wide open!

James, Trowbridge says...
1:31pm Thu 28 Aug 08

deemed to be 'outside of village policy limits'.

Oh, so a Gypsy site in Semington isn't then!!

Local Bloke, Leigh Park, Westbury says...
1:41pm Thu 28 Aug 08

Government planning policies dictate that gypsy sites proposed outside village development limits are exceptions that should be permitted if the site is otherwise suitable (eg. relatively close to amenities and with good access to roads etc) and in compliance with other planning criteria (such as effect on the landscape).

Mr_flibble, trowbridge says...
4:24pm Thu 28 Aug 08

Too many people spout off on this site without any true knowledge of the subject matter.

bigfoot, Wilts says...
5:41pm Thu 28 Aug 08

Perhaps if he had not been a white anglo saxon things would be a bit different, or am I just being cynical?

Paul, Warminster says...
7:48am Fri 29 Aug 08

Mr_flibble wrote:
Too many people spout off on this site without any true knowledge of the subject matter.
Perhaps you should tell all, then it will stop people spouting off as you call it

Wiltshire Watcher, Hilperton says...
10:16am Fri 29 Aug 08

Mr_flibble wrote:
Too many people spout off on this site without any true knowledge of the subject matter.
That's what makes reading these comments so much fun.

walter, wilshur says...
9:48am Sat 30 Aug 08

bigfoot wrote:
Perhaps if he had not been a white anglo saxon things would be a bit different, or am I just being cynical?
No, regretfully you're dead right. Now;, if he were to say it brought him closer to Mohammed.........

Local Bloke, Leigh Park, Westbury says...
1:17pm Sun 31 Aug 08

Local Bloke wrote:
Government planning policies dictate that gypsy sites proposed outside village development limits are exceptions that should be permitted if the site is otherwise suitable (eg. relatively close to amenities and with good access to roads etc) and in compliance with other planning criteria (such as effect on the landscape).
I should have added that the Highways Authority did object to this proposal on highways grounds, which would have given the district council a solid reason for refusing this proposal.

Anyone who says that the district council had no choice but to grant permission is telling bullsh!t.

Local Bloke, Leigh Park, Westbury says...
1:18pm Sun 31 Aug 08

Oops .... sorry, my above comment was related to the gypsy site in Semington - not this earth home proposal.

walter, wilshur says...
6:47am Mon 1 Sep 08

Mr_flibble wrote:
Too many people spout off on this site without any true knowledge of the subject matter.
I thought you were describing the House of Commons.

Your sayYourTimes

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Wiltshire Times account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Sponsored Links


Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »