Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'WILTS TIMES' to 80360 or email » »
|
|
|
|
|
Got a story? CLICK HERE to email us, call the newsdesk on 01225 773638 or text your tip-offs to
80360, starting your message with WILTS TIMES'
9:05am Thursday 28th August 2008
PLANS to build an underground home in a west Wiltshire village have been rejected by councillors.
The ecological three-bedroom earth shelter project in High Street, Chapmanslade, near Warminster, was refused planning permission by West Wiltshire District Council's planning committee on Thursday as it was deemed to be 'outside of village policy limits'.
Alvin Howard, agent for the project on behalf of the applicant Clive Michael, from Chapmanslade, said they would be appealing the decision.
He said: "It is outside the village development policy area so it is against policy legally but the point is that there is a new Government clause which states that if you design a beautiful house with the latest technology that is an inspiration to others, we should be given planning permission, but that wasn't the case.
"We will go to the Government (the Secretary of State for the Environment) because they included the clause and clearly the district council didn't look at it properly. They just look over it with their petty rules.
"I really thought they would be more enlightened."
The house would be built using low emission concrete and recycled stone and rubble, similar to that used in the Roman times.
This type of house is usually built with underground heat recovery and costs 30 per cent more than an above ground house of an equivalent size.
Properties like this are designed to last for more than 1,000 years.
Parish councillors felt the building would be contrary to the development plan for the village.
The Environment Agency also objected, saying it would 'create an unacceptable risk of pollution', The two main benefits of an earth shelter are that it takes on the ambient temperature of the soil around it, and isn't attacked by above ground emissions that deteriorate buildings.
Mr Howard, a member of the British Earth Sheltering Association, said: "One always thinks of dank, dark caves where hobbits live but it's not like that at all."
Disgusted of, Westbury says...
12:05pm Thu 28 Aug 08
CONFUSED OF MELKSHAM, MELKSHAM says...
12:54pm Thu 28 Aug 08
Local Bloke, Leigh Park, Westbury says...
12:55pm Thu 28 Aug 08
Local Bloke, Leigh Park, Westbury says...
1:18pm Thu 28 Aug 08
CONFUSED OF MELKSHAM wrote:The development control system refers to planning policies for NEW development proposals.
Watch out stonehenge, the planners will be knocking it down when they realise it didn't have planning consent and is not constucted using local stone and is not in the local developement plan.
Mr_flibble, trowbridge says...
1:20pm Thu 28 Aug 08
Disgusted of wrote:where is your evidence of this? You should blow this story wide open!
Maybe the applicant forgot to hand over the brown envelope?
James, Trowbridge says...
1:31pm Thu 28 Aug 08
Local Bloke, Leigh Park, Westbury says...
1:41pm Thu 28 Aug 08
Mr_flibble, trowbridge says...
4:24pm Thu 28 Aug 08
bigfoot, Wilts says...
5:41pm Thu 28 Aug 08
Paul, Warminster says...
7:48am Fri 29 Aug 08
Mr_flibble wrote:Perhaps you should tell all, then it will stop people spouting off as you call it
Too many people spout off on this site without any true knowledge of the subject matter.
Wiltshire Watcher, Hilperton says...
10:16am Fri 29 Aug 08
Mr_flibble wrote:That's what makes reading these comments so much fun.
Too many people spout off on this site without any true knowledge of the subject matter.
walter, wilshur says...
9:48am Sat 30 Aug 08
bigfoot wrote:No, regretfully you're dead right. Now;, if he were to say it brought him closer to Mohammed.........
Perhaps if he had not been a white anglo saxon things would be a bit different, or am I just being cynical?
Local Bloke, Leigh Park, Westbury says...
1:17pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Local Bloke wrote:I should have added that the Highways Authority did object to this proposal on highways grounds, which would have given the district council a solid reason for refusing this proposal.
Government planning policies dictate that gypsy sites proposed outside village development limits are exceptions that should be permitted if the site is otherwise suitable (eg. relatively close to amenities and with good access to roads etc) and in compliance with other planning criteria (such as effect on the landscape).
Local Bloke, Leigh Park, Westbury says...
1:18pm Sun 31 Aug 08
walter, wilshur says...
6:47am Mon 1 Sep 08
Mr_flibble wrote:I thought you were describing the House of Commons.
Too many people spout off on this site without any true knowledge of the subject matter.
Add your comment
Register for a FREE Wiltshire Times account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find your next job now in Wiltshire and beyond
Search Now »
Why not make a date in Wiltshire?
Search Now »
Homes for sale and to let in Wiltshire
Search Now »
Cars for sale in Wiltshire and beyond
Search Now »
Paul, Warminster says...
9:31am Thu 28 Aug 08
How can a ecological built house create pollution if all the plans have been looked at and agreed.
Surly this is the way most houses should be built nowadays.