"He said his private life and sexuality were not news."
Might not be news but it's nice to be kept informed.

News for you mate, your rights were blown away as soon as you downloaded the first indecent image.

Well done Chippenham News - Everyones conscience is clear except his...

He was unlucky, obviously picked a slow news day to do his delivery. Come to that, lately every day has been a slow news day at WT. Do I detect a fall in the number of staff reporters and a dependance on readers texts and emails?

Surely the bloke has done his time and is now kept an eye on by whatever services gets involved with these people after they leave prison Tacky little rags like WT are indeed only chasing him to harrass him. If his behaviour was serious enough for him to not be near a nursery then such an order banning him from doing so would have been part of his parol conditions. WT achieve nothing by such gutter stories other than to prove how sh1tty WT is and how desperate it is to get readers these days.

However politically 'incorrect' common sense may actually be these days, I agree with DILLIGAF on this. The man was not 'working' at the nursery (which would have been another matter entirely) He was a delivery driver for Sainsburys for goodness sake. Experience also shows that if an offender is gainfully employed, the chances of his re-offending are greatly reduced. So, net result? The man has now lost his job and has plenty of time on his hands! I'm sure his probation officer is well-pleased!

perhaps the gentleman should be stop from walking round the streets or going shopping lots of children around these places and not all with parents to keep a eye on them. delivering to a Nursery poses know more risk the mans been caught let him get on with his life.
I don not agree with what he did and agree he should be punished.
but he can not keep being punished for the rest of his life.

i can see both pints of views of the different commenets on here....BUT what if it was your child at this nursery or grandchild !!! wouldnt you want toknow if there was someone around the premises that you should be on your guard against cincerning your young ones....... iknow i would ..
if he is not allowed near children again then he shouldnt really be dilivering to a nursery school to be honest....

interesting responses from ronnie,SteveK and DILLIGAF who have chosen Spencer as the victim..a paedophile's victim is a child..a paedophile is a danger to children FOR EVER!! even convicted ones who have served their sentences are still a risk to children FOR EVER!! Children must must always be protected even to the extent of erring on the over cautious

jh wrote:
interesting responses from ronnie,SteveK and DILLIGAF who have chosen Spencer as the victim..a paedophile's victim is a child..a paedophile is a danger to children FOR EVER!! even convicted ones who have served their sentences are still a risk to children FOR EVER!! Children must must always be protected even to the extent of erring on the over cautious

I realise that children need to be protected, But you can keep him away from children for ever
without locking him up perhaps that should have happen but it did not so the man has to beable to work and earn a living.

Maybe the application form he filled out where it says 'Do you have a criminal record' was overlooked?
It would be interesting to find out if the employer had this question on the form?

Whats Sainsbury's take on this?
I know every application form I've filled out had it.

Or is there some cover up or immunity for paedophiles to declare this?

I do hate the misuse of the word "paedophile". It comes from Greek: "pais" = child and "philia" = love. Most people love children. Can't we use the terms "vile perv" or similar?

jh wrote:
interesting responses from ronnie,SteveK and DILLIGAF who have chosen Spencer as the victim..a paedophile's victim is a child..a paedophile is a danger to children FOR EVER!! even convicted ones who have served their sentences are still a risk to children FOR EVER!! Children must must always be protected even to the extent of erring on the over cautious

Dont talk such cr@p. The guy downloaded a few iffy pictures. He did not fiddle with kids nor is he ever likely to. I'd expect the staff at the nursery to act *IF* anyone approached the children innapropriately but to be honest you are far more likely to find a kiddy fiddler INSIDE a nursery rather than delivering to it.
I'd also say that Spencer is very much a victim both of the current witch hunt and whatever causes people to decide that looking at such filth gives them a kick.
Still, when some drunken vigilante mob burn Spencers house down along with whoever else was in it at the time then WT can say how clever it has been eh?

DILLIGAF wrote:

jh wrote: interesting responses from ronnie,SteveK and DILLIGAF who have chosen Spencer as the victim..a paedophile's victim is a child..a paedophile is a danger to children FOR EVER!! even convicted ones who have served their sentences are still a risk to children FOR EVER!! Children must must always be protected even to the extent of erring on the over cautious

Dont talk such cr@p. The guy downloaded a few iffy pictures. He did not fiddle with kids nor is he ever likely to. I'd expect the staff at the nursery to act *IF* anyone approached the children innapropriately but to be honest you are far more likely to find a kiddy fiddler INSIDE a nursery rather than delivering to it. I'd also say that Spencer is very much a victim both of the current witch hunt and whatever causes people to decide that looking at such filth gives them a kick. Still, when some drunken vigilante mob burn Spencers house down along with whoever else was in it at the time then WT can say how clever it has been eh?

what di you assume a few to be in the report it says hundreds well thats more than a few si he was more than curious I think,and sounds more than a bit iffy to me.If your child was on one of these pictures im sure your view would be different.

cindy wrote:
I do hate the misuse of the word "paedophile". It comes from Greek: "pais" = child and "philia" = love. Most people love children. Can't we use the terms "vile perv" or similar?

I quite agree Cindy. And did I ever tell you,the wife's mother thought a paedophile was something you used to file your toe nails?

concerned in wilts wrote:

DILLIGAF wrote:

jh wrote: interesting responses from ronnie,SteveK and DILLIGAF who have chosen Spencer as the victim..a paedophile's victim is a child..a paedophile is a danger to children FOR EVER!! even convicted ones who have served their sentences are still a risk to children FOR EVER!! Children must must always be protected even to the extent of erring on the over cautious

Dont talk such cr@p. The guy downloaded a few iffy pictures. He did not fiddle with kids nor is he ever likely to. I'd expect the staff at the nursery to act *IF* anyone approached the children innapropriately but to be honest you are far more likely to find a kiddy fiddler INSIDE a nursery rather than delivering to it. I'd also say that Spencer is very much a victim both of the current witch hunt and whatever causes people to decide that looking at such filth gives them a kick. Still, when some drunken vigilante mob burn Spencers house down along with whoever else was in it at the time then WT can say how clever it has been eh?

what di you assume a few to be in the report it says hundreds well thats more than a few si he was more than curious I think,and sounds more than a bit iffy to me.If your child was on one of these pictures im sure your view would be different.

i agree, he's a dirty rotten SCUMBAG, he had a freekin suspended sentence, no jail time, you know why cos if he'd gone inside he would have never come out again, and i say good! i think capital punishment chould be brought back for these dirty pigs, everyone on the sex offenders list should be strung up and stoned to death,