End of road for Westbury bypass plan

Campaign for a Better Trowbridge members, from left, are Michael Walter, Roger Evans, Jenny Raggett, Nigel Williams, Richard Covington and Ken McCall Photo: Glenn Phillips  (49328)

Campaign for a Better Trowbridge members, from left, are Michael Walter, Roger Evans, Jenny Raggett, Nigel Williams, Richard Covington and Ken McCall Photo: Glenn Phillips (49328)

First published in Trowbridge
Last updated

Members of Campaign for a Better Trowbridge said they are delighted that the saved eastern Westbury bypass policy has been removed in proposed modifications to the Wiltshire Core Strategy.

The core strategy, which has been developed with communities over the last five years, was scrutinised at public hearing sessions last summer as part of its examination by an independent government inspector.

As a result, the inspector has put forward modifications to some aspects of the plan, including the replacement of the saved eastern Westbury bypass policy with a more general CP66 policy, which covers strategic road, rail and bus.

The former £31m bypass scheme was initially thrown out by the Government in July 2009, as it claimed both traffic and accident levels were not high enough.

The proposal, which took a decade to put together, proved highly controversial, with many people objecting to the road passing east of the town through the picturesque Wellhead Valley.

Ken McCall, from Campaign for a Better Trowbridge, said: “We are delighted that the Planning Inspectorate has understood that safeguarding the route of a major road, which has already been kicked out after a detailed and lengthy planning inquiry, is lunacy.

“Our council wasted approximately £5million of local money on the eastern Westbury Bypass and they didn’t appeal against the decision of the Secretary of Sate to reject it. Sneaking the same route in the Core Strategy via a back door was neither fair nor right, but luckily Wiltshire Council has been told to make amends.”

The Westbury bypass plans were revived when the council published its core strategy, which sets out the sites and scales for new roads, wind turbines, housing developments and industrial estates between now and 2026.

The bypass was included, sparking a campaign from the original bypass protestors when the plans were scrutinised by the independent inspector.

Campaign for Better Trowbridge have argued at the Trowbridge Area Board that if a bypass for Westbury is ever built, the people of Trowbridge need to be part of the discussion.

They say this is because a road on the industrial side of Westbury, between Trowbridge and Westbury, would take lorries out of the Trowbridge suburbs and villages, as well as Westbury.

This was highlighted in the inspector's report in 2009, which said that a route to the west had economic benefits for a wider area than one to the east. It was also highlighted that the landscape of the White Horse area should be preserved.

A Wiltshire Council spokesman said: “The Inspector has proposed a modification to remove this saved policy as he considers it should be replaced with Core Policy 66 – Strategic Transport Network, which refers to A350 Corridor and the need to maintain, manage and selectively improve it to support growth at Chippenham, Melksham, Trowbridge, Westbury and Warminster.”

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:59pm Fri 18 Apr 14

Room101 says...

Please tell me WHAT the Westbury bypass has got to do with Trowbridge. Even if it the wrong decision for an eastern one. People in Trowbrige don't have to live on the A350 that runs through Westbury. If these people have so much input, why don't they sort out the problems with the traffic. Don't hear them complaining about about the council spending millions on 600 yards of road in Chippenham.
Please tell me WHAT the Westbury bypass has got to do with Trowbridge. Even if it the wrong decision for an eastern one. People in Trowbrige don't have to live on the A350 that runs through Westbury. If these people have so much input, why don't they sort out the problems with the traffic. Don't hear them complaining about about the council spending millions on 600 yards of road in Chippenham. Room101
  • Score: 11

11:12pm Fri 18 Apr 14

vox sanitatem says...

What a pathetic bunch of NIMBYs with nothing better to do!
What a pathetic bunch of NIMBYs with nothing better to do! vox sanitatem
  • Score: 7

11:17pm Fri 18 Apr 14

vox sanitatem says...

"Campaign for a better Trowbridge"? Should be renamed "protecting my precious view" . Sad bunch of losers
"Campaign for a better Trowbridge"? Should be renamed "protecting my precious view" . Sad bunch of losers vox sanitatem
  • Score: 5

8:58am Tue 22 Apr 14

Dr H Z Hackenbush says...

Another classic example of NIMBY bullying!

And a couple of points.....


• The former £31m bypass scheme was initially thrown out by the Government in July 2009, as it claimed both traffic and accident levels were not high enough.
SO THERE AS TO BE DEATHS BEFORE THEY WILL ACT???

• with many people objecting to the road passing east of the town through the picturesque Wellhead Valley
AND SINCE WHEN HAS THE WELLHEAD VALLEY BEEN ANYTHING TO DO WITH TROWBRIDGE????
Another classic example of NIMBY bullying! And a couple of points..... • The former £31m bypass scheme was initially thrown out by the Government in July 2009, as it claimed both traffic and accident levels were not high enough. SO THERE AS TO BE DEATHS BEFORE THEY WILL ACT??? • with many people objecting to the road passing east of the town through the picturesque Wellhead Valley AND SINCE WHEN HAS THE WELLHEAD VALLEY BEEN ANYTHING TO DO WITH TROWBRIDGE???? Dr H Z Hackenbush
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree